NABL Test Report for Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel
Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel: NABL Lab Test Report
NABL lab test report for Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel: heavy metals not detected, pathogens absent and pH 3.63. Batch AC4H028.
Safety Summary: Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel
Is Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel safe? Yes. It was independently tested at Sigma Test & Research Centre, a laboratory accredited by NABL (Accreditation No. TC-5369). The tested sample, from batch AC4H028, was analysed against the limits in the referenced standards.
Free from lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury and antimony. The report found no detectable lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury or antimony - each was below the laboratory's detection limit of 0.25 mg/kg.
Free from harmful bacteria and fungi. Four organisms were tested: Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. All were reported Absent. Total microbial count was Less than 10 cfu/gm (limit 1000 cfu/gm); Total yeast & mould count was Less than 10 cfu/gm (limit 100 cfu/gm).
Gentle, skin-friendly pH. The measured pH is 3.63, which is mildly acidic.
Sulphate-free and paraben-free. The published ingredient list contains no sulphates, parabens, silicones or mineral oil. Preservation uses phenoxyethanol and sodium benzoate.
Is it chemical free? No cosmetic is chemical-free - water itself is a chemical. This one is free from sulphates, parabens, silicones, mineral oil and any detectable lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury or antimony.
What these results cover. The laboratory findings apply to the tested sample from batch AC4H028 and the parameters listed on this page. Skin tolerance is assessed separately, in the dermatological patch test certificate. NABL accredits laboratories, not products.
Key Findings at a Glance
Results of Analysis
Result is the measured outcome for this batch. Requirement / Limit is the specification where the standard defines one; a dash means it defines none. Test Method is the standard the laboratory followed.
| Parameter | Result | Requirement / Limit | Test Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical & Organoleptic | |||
| Appearance | Purple colour soft mass | - | STRC/STP/F256 |
| Colour | Purple | - | STRC/STP/F256 |
| Odour | Characteristic | - | STRC/STP/P044 |
| Chemical Parameters | |||
| pH | 3.63 | - | IS:15153:2002 |
| Stability (45±1C for 48 hours) | Passes the test | - | IS:15153:2002 |
| Solid Content, %w/w | 33.01 | - | IS:15153:2002 |
| Heavy Metals | |||
| Lead (as Pb), mg/kg | Not Detected (DL 0.25) | - | STRC/STP/P018 |
| Cadmium (as Cd), mg/kg | Not Detected (DL 0.25) | - | STRC/STP/P018 |
| Arsenic (as As), mg/kg | Not Detected (DL 0.25) | - | STRC/STP/P018 |
| Mercury (as Hg), mg/kg | Not Detected (DL 0.1) | - | STRC/STP/P018 |
| Antimony (as Sb), mg/kg | Not Detected (DL 0.25) | - | STRC/STP/P018 |
| Microbial Counts | |||
| Total microbial count, cfu/gm | Less than 10 | NMT 1000 | IS:14648:2011 |
| Total yeast & mould count, cfu/gm | Less than 10 | NMT 100 | IS:14648:2011 |
| Pathogens | |||
| Escherichia coli, per gm | Absent | - | IS:14648:2011 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa, per gm | Absent | - | IS:14648:2011 |
| Staphylococcus aureus, per gm | Absent | - | IS:14648:2011 |
| Candida albicans, per gm | Absent | - | IS:14648:2011 |
Understanding These Tests for Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel
Physical & Organoleptic
On the tested sample, Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel was recorded as a purple colour soft mass, purple in colour and with a characteristic odour.
These checks record what the laboratory observed in the sample as received.
Chemical Parameters
It also lists pH 3.63, stability Passes the test and solid Content 33.01 %w/w, for which the standard sets no specification.
Chemical parameters are measured against the standard's specification where one exists.
Heavy Metals
In this report, Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel showed no detectable lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury or antimony - each below the laboratory's detection limit of 0.25 mg/kg.
Heavy metals can enter a product through raw materials or manufacturing.
Microbial Counts
Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel recorded total microbial count Less than 10 cfu/gm against a limit of NMT 1000 cfu/gm and total yeast & mould count Less than 10 cfu/gm against a limit of NMT 100 cfu/gm.
These tests count viable microorganisms against the limits set by the standard.
Pathogens
In the tested sample of Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans were reported Absent - not detected in the tested quantity.
Pathogen tests cover only the organisms listed, not all microorganisms.
Test Overview
| Report Title | Chemical and Microbiological Analysis - Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel |
| Parameters Measured | physical and organoleptic properties, chemical parameters, heavy metals, microbial counts and pathogens |
| Test Type | Laboratory chemical and microbiological analysis of a product sample |
| Test Methods | IS:15153:2002; IS:14648:2011 |
| Sample Tested | AC4H028 (30 ml x 5) |
About Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel
An exfoliating peel for luminous, even-toned skin. Dr Sheth’s Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel combines 5 exfoliating acids to give you an expert-like facial glow from the comfort of your home. A potent combination of AHAs (Lactic Acid, Glycolic Acid and Mandelic Acid), PHA (Gluconolactone) and BHA (Salicylic Acid) exfoliates dead skin, reduces dullness and clarifies congested pores. Natural fruit extracts and Aloe Vera further brighten and calm irritation and give you glowing, even-toned skin. Key benefits: Exfoliates dead skin and clogged pores Brightens and evens skin tone Reduces d
Claims and Their Evidence
Lab-sourced rows are measured results. Product-page rows are the brand's own claims, shown with the brand's qualifier. The laboratory report is not evidence for cosmetic-benefit claims.
| Statement | Evidence / basis | Source |
|---|---|---|
| No detectable heavy metals | Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic, Mercury and Antimony reported Not Detected at a detection limit of 0.25 mg/kg. | Lab report 13029788/A |
| Within microbiological limits | Counts within the standard limits; specified pathogens reported Absent. | Lab report 13029788/B |
| 10% Glycolic Acid (brightens skin) 10% Lactic Acid (evens out complexion) 5% Mandelic Acid (exfoliates even sensitive skin) | Brand claim published on the product page. | Product page (brand claim) |
| Sulphate-free cleansing base | No SLS or SLES in the published ingredient list. | Product ingredient list |
| Paraben-free | No parabens in the published ingredient list. | Product ingredient list |
Report Details
| Testing Laboratory | Sigma Test & Research Centre (NABL-accredited, Accreditation No. TC-5369) |
| ULR Number | TC536924000009969F |
| Report No. | 13029788/A, 13029788/B |
| Report Issue Date | 08/10/2024 |
| Testing Period | 25/09/2024 to 03/10/2024 |
| Batch Tested | AC4H028 (Mfg. 08/2024; 08/2026) |
| Standards Referenced | IS:15153:2002; IS:14648:2011 |
| Authorised Signatory | Vinit Sharma, Person Incharge, Sigma Test & Research Centre |
What This Report Shows
What the results demonstrate
- Physical characteristics of the tested sample were recorded as observed by the laboratory.
- The listed heavy metals were below the laboratory's detection limit in the tested sample.
- The tested sample met the microbiological count limits of the referenced standard.
- The specified pathogenic microorganisms were reported Absent in the tested sample.
- Testing was performed by an NABL-accredited laboratory.
What the results do not demonstrate
- They do not certify the product; NABL accredits laboratories, not products.
- They do not establish overall safety or suitability for every individual.
- They do not prove any cosmetic-benefit or performance claim; those are addressed separately and on the product page.
- They do not cover parameters or organisms outside those listed.
- They apply to the tested sample from the stated batch, not necessarily to other batches.
Formulation at a Glance
From the ingredient list published on the product page. Not part of the laboratory report.
Active Ingredients
| Component | Role in the formulation |
|---|---|
| Glycolic Acid | Alpha-hydroxy acid used for surface exfoliation. |
| Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice (Aloe Vera) | Aloe vera; soothing and hydrating botanical. |
| Salicylic Acid | Beta-hydroxy acid used for exfoliation and clarity. |
| Panthenol (Vitamin B5) | Pro-vitamin B5 humectant supporting moisture and elasticity. |
| Vaccinium Angustifolium (Blueberry) Fruit Extract | Blueberry or wild-berry fruit extract; antioxidant botanical. |
| Sodium Hyaluronate (Hyaluronic Acid) | Salt of hyaluronic acid; binds water for hydration. |
Moisturising and Emollient
| Component | Role in the formulation |
|---|---|
| Propylene Glycol | Humectant and solvent. |
| Glycerin | Humectant that draws water into the skin surface. |
Texture and Stability
| Component | Role in the formulation |
|---|---|
| Aqua (Water) | Solvent base of the formulation. |
| Sodium Hydroxide | Adjusts the pH of the formulation. |
| Xanthan Gum | Natural thickener that stabilises the formulation. |
| Disodium EDTA | Chelating agent that stabilises the formula against metal ions. |
Preservative System
| Component | Role in the formulation |
|---|---|
| Phenoxyethanol | Broad-spectrum preservative used at low levels. |
| Chlorphenesin | Preservative used in low-level systems. |
| Sodium Benzoate | Preservative effective in acidic formulations. |
What the Formulation Leaves Out
| Excluded | Basis |
|---|---|
| No sulphates | Not present in the published ingredient list. |
| No parabens | Not present in the published ingredient list. |
| No silicones | Not present in the published ingredient list. |
| No mineral oil | Not present in the published ingredient list. |
Published Research on Key Actives
Published literature on each ingredient, not studies on this product.
| Ingredient | Published finding | Relevance to the formulation |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Hyaluronic acid is documented as a key water-binding molecule in skin hydration (Papakonstantinou E, et al. Dermatoendocrinol. 2012;4(3):253-258). | Supports hyaluronic acid or sodium hyaluronate as a hydrating agent. |
| Panthenol (Pro-Vitamin B5) | Topical dexpanthenol is documented to support hydration and barrier function (Proksch E, et al. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2009;10(6):359-367). | Supports panthenol for moisture retention and elasticity. |
| Aloe Vera | Aloe vera has documented moisturising and soothing properties in dermatological use (Surjushe A, et al. Indian J Dermatol. 2008;53(4):163-166). | Supports aloe vera as a soothing and hydrating botanical. |
| Salicylic Acid | Salicylic acid is an established beta-hydroxy acid used in acne and exfoliation protocols (Arif T. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015;8:455-461). | Supports salicylic acid as an exfoliating and clarifying active. |
| Glycolic Acid | Glycolic acid peels are documented for surface renewal and pigmentation concerns (Sharad J. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:281-288). | Supports glycolic acid as a surface-exfoliating active. |
Dermatological Patch Testing
This NABL lab test report covers the chemical and microbiological analysis of Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel. Skin tolerance is assessed separately: Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel is dermatologically patch tested on human subjects under the supervision of a qualified dermatologist. The patch test certificate page for this product has not been published online yet; this page will link to it once it is live.
View the Original Lab Report
The complete original report for Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel is available as issued by the laboratory. It carries the laboratory letterhead, the ULR number, and the authorised signatory's details.
The Tested Product
Medifacial @ Home : High Strength Peel
The results on this page come from laboratory testing of a sample from batch AC4H028. See the complete ingredient list, current offers and reviews on the product page.
View ProductFrequently Asked Questions
A: Yes. In this report, Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic, Mercury and Antimony were reported below the laboratory's stated detection limit of 0.25 mg/kg at Sigma Test & Research Centre, an NABL-accredited laboratory (Accreditation No. TC-5369).
A: For the tested batch, microbial counts were reported within the limits of the referenced standard and the specified pathogens were reported Absent. These results indicate the tested sample met the referenced microbiological limits; they do not establish overall product safety.
A: The measured pH in this report is 3.63.
A: The published ingredient list for this product contains no sulphates, parabens, silicones or mineral oil. This is based on the ingredient list, not on the laboratory report, which covers contaminants and microbiological quality.
A: No. The report covers chemical and microbiological parameters on a sample from the stated batch. Performance and cosmetic-benefit claims are made by the brand on the product page and are not part of this laboratory report.
A: "Not Detected" means a substance was below the laboratory's stated detection limit using the specified method. "Absent" means a specified microorganism was not detected in the tested quantity using the referenced method.
A: A ULR (Unique Lab Report) number is a one-of-a-kind identifier that NABL-accredited laboratories print on every test report, making it traceable. The ULR for this report is TC536924000009969F. The original report PDF linked on this page carries the laboratory letterhead and authorised signatory details.
A: No. NABL accredits laboratories, not products. This page reports the results of testing performed at Sigma Test & Research Centre, an NABL-accredited laboratory (Accreditation No. TC-5369) on a sample of this product. It does not represent a product certification by NABL.
A: The report covers batch AC4H028 (manufactured 08/2024). The laboratory report states the tested sample as 30 ml x 5. Results refer only to the tested sample and the parameters listed.
References
- IS:15153:2002. Bureau of Indian Standards.
- IS:14648:2011. Bureau of Indian Standards.
- Arif T. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015;8:455-461.
- Sharad J. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:281-288.
- Sigma Test & Research Centre. Test reports 13029788/A, 13029788/B.
